AUC vesus Reps reps= [1 2 4 8 16]

auc_reps_mu_1_kk_1.pdf

auc_reps_all_in_1.pdf

Download Figures: auc_reps_all_in_1.pdf and each separate figures in directory.

Note: Bars are grouped to show AT LEAST how many reps for x-arc is needed to reach some range of AUC value.
For example:
In the first subfigure (mu=1, kk =1), to reach range [0.625, 0.65], 0-arc at least reps =16 is needed, others only need reps =1.

Download AUC_data: arc0_mat; arc1_mat;arc2_mat;arc3_mat
In 1-arc test, auc value is stored by arc1_mat(mu_ind,kk_ind,reps_ind) = auc;
e.g. if mu = 2, kk =3, reps =8, the corresponding index should be arc1(2,3,4).

Setting:
murange = [1 2 4];
kkrange = [1:3];
reps = [1 2 4 8 16];

AUC vesus Reps

Download:
http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~juanli/auc_vs_reps/

p.s. mu_p5.pdf contains the legend, others don't have a legend.

Setting:
reps = [1 4 8];
murange = [0.1 0.5 1 2 4 8 12 16];
kkrange = [1:16];
seeds=[1:10];

AUC vesus Reps

Download:
http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~juanli/auc_vs_reps/

p.s. mu_p5.pdf contains the legend, others don't have a legend.

Setting:
reps = [1 4 8];
murange = [0.1 0.5 1 2 4 8 12 16];
kkrange = [1:16];
seeds=[1:10];

ROC / AUC scripts + biossm tarball

1. ROC / AUC scripts
Download: http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~juanli/roc_auc.zip

2. biossm tarball
Download: http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~juanli/biossm.tar

vsn & E_Coli calculation scripts

Download:
vsn script
E_Coli script
vbssm_v3.3.7

Both scripts are OK on my desktop, but I have no time to modify corresponding paths for your running, sorry.

readme.txt will be helpful, take a look.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
actually what we should do is to run vsn_normalization data with the same priors - please could post your scripts for this ecoli calculation and the vsn_normalization calculation also. I 'll get my new student to look at them while you are away. Maybe we can talk when you return if we have any questions before you start work?

E_Coli expr

Data is sightly changed on gene 'hns'!

The profile of gene 'hns' is modified to have constant of 0, -20, -100, respectively, after normalization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This gene should have zero expression, which may mean that it should be constant and very low (negative) after normalization, rather than zero. -David

1. F vs kk

Hyper-opt is on_______ Hyper-opt is off

2. Add Posterior(vsn-normalization) as Prior(E_Coli.xls --'no-inter' sheet)

Part of Frequency Table for Shift Subset

Download: FreqTable(PDF): hns = 0, -20, -100
3-in-1 xls file: freq0-20-100.xls

Prior script

http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~juanli/Prior_Scripts.rar

norm script

Download:
1. norm_genes.m
2. example_genes.xls

norm_genes contains 3 parts:
1. read xls file
2. normlize data
3. generate input data for vbssm model.

Note:
1. 'example_genes.xls' is generated by extracting first 10 genes from 'E.coli.values.xls'--'no-inter' sheet.
2. There are 2 replicates timeseries , each of 8 timepoints
3. Data is already log-transformed

hns profiles after normalization

--From David------------------------
please could you post a figure of the profiles of gene hns after your normalization? this gene should have zero expression, which may mean that it should be constant and very low (negative) after normalization, rather than zero. we should check

inter

Part of Frequency Table for Shift Subset

Download: freq_EColi_post_as_prior.pdf

Notes:
1. Shift Subset is defined from Page 16 of Manchester.pdf

2. In muD (prior mean matrix of D), only 12 entries'signs are adjusted, based on the info in memo1. Only these 12 entries are multiplied with mu value (e.g. *0.5), when mu varies. Other entries inherit their sign and value from previous experiment.

3. 10 posterior MEAN matrices for A,B,C, D from the previous experiment (vsn_normalization), with some entries adjusted for the new priors. However, vbssm is unable to run when posterior COVARIANCE is incorporated, since 'trigamma' function will report severe problem to stop computation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memo1:Priors 
hns-> glpC, glpQ +ve (these appeared in the model network and were confirmed by the experiment)
hns-> cyo D,E,B,A no connection (not confirmed by experiment)
hns -> sdhB -ve (confirmed)
hns-> arcA no connection
hns-> appY -ve (connected confirmed but sign different)
hns-> cad A,B -ve (opposite sign)
hns -> hdeB -ve (opposite sign)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memo2. Posterior
Expt A, instead of starting with 10 random seeds, you need to start from the 10 posterior matrices for A,B,C, D from the previous experiment (vsn_normalization), with the means and variances adjusted for the new priors, i.e. the posteriors from the previous experiment become the priors for the new experiment.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note:
Q: How to present 'no connection' in prior matrix?
A: This is be a prior constrained around zero - i.e mean zero but with very tight distribution (low variance)

Set Prior Covariance Matrix for A,B,C,D

vbnet examples: mu = 0 (no prior), mu = 0.1 (with prior)

Download: ARD derivation notes

Data: Zak's data
reps = 4;
kk = 6;
arc = 9; (arc 9 is added as prior arc)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Juan

I guess so, how did you specify priors for the ARD prior experiments?
You need to set the mean and variance I guess, which would just be the diagonal of the full covariance matrix.
-- In ARD expr,
where delta = 1*ones(pinp,1) % by default initialization in Matt's code.

So, I only need to set the mean, let variance be default -Juan

I didn't realize the code output the full covaraiances - maybe we can look at the posterior covariances to understand correlation between the parameters as I suggested earlier - can you put some samples from the ARD prior experiments (Zak's data) on the web site?
- See top

Let's try to talk at 8am Friday if that works for you. If not then Thursday 8am would also work for me

- OK, Friday 8am.

David
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I happen to realize that, vbssm specifies the Prior Covariance matrix of D as diagonal, not full matrix.
(see the attached derivation Page 2, Equation 7)

But, I have checked that the Posterior Covariance matrix of D obtained from the previous experiment (vsn_normalization) is actually a full matrix. How should we treat it? Is it OK to let the non-diagonal entries be zero, in order to fit the vbssm model?

-Juan

F vs kk for "E_Coli_ no_inter_sheet"

Hyper-opt is on_______ Hyper-opt is off

Download: PDF
Data: E.coli.values.xls, no-inter sheet (normalized by Juan afterwards)
Hyper-optimization = on ( same as vsn-normalization.xls)
its = 2000.

Compared with Figure 5 of Zak's data (below), F_kk figure above seems make sense.

Hyper-opt is on_______ Hyper-opt is off

vsn_normalization, including 'pnp' profiles

It's good that optimum k stays at 6, after pnp profiles added

including 'pnp' profiles

original

From David,
Experiment B) vsn_normalization

repeat the experiements run earlier (control and shift) but include the expression prifiles for pnp

you should probably rerun F vs K first but I wouldn't expect K to change

Accumulative vs Non-Accumulative for Zak's Data

Non-Accumutive: reps = 8, kk = 4

Accumutive: reps = 8, kk = 4

Download:
Accumulative figures

Non-Accumulative figures

zak_accu_nonaccu.zip

Data: 'Zak's'.
reps = [1 4 8]; stdrange = [1.66 2.33 3]
kkrange = [1:16]; // According to Matt, we didn't explore optimal kk value for Zak's data
murange = [0 .1 .5 1 2 4 8 12 16 32 64 100];
seedrange = [1:10];

Results are the average of 10 models (seeds).

Prior Test for "Shift Subset"

Part of Frequency Table for Shift Subset

Download: PriorTest_Shift_subset.pdf

Notes:
1. Shift Subst is defined from Page 16 of Manchester.pdf
2. Priors are defined from Page 15 of Manchester.pdf

4 verified interactions are incorporated as Priors for vbssm model:

hns pd appY
hns pd cadA
hns pd cadB
hns pd hdeB

The other 2 verified interactions do NOT belong to Shift Subset

arcA pd hybB
gutM pd srlR

Aucroc T = 6 figure

Download: roc_reps4_somek_ho0_allT.pdf

Download: meanaucreps2-4-8-16_ho0_allT.pdf
reps = [2 4 8 16], T = [6 12 120]

Download: aucroc_reps4_k1-16_ho0_allT.pdf
reps = 4, T = [6 12 120]

Zak data, scripts and our simulated data sets

Download: Zak_Data.zip

Note: Folder "Matt_profiles" contains the script Matt wrote to generate the plot of the noisy versions of the mRNAs.
i.e. 'MA','MB','MC','MD','ME','MF','MG','MH','MJ','MK'

Accumulative vs Non-Accumulative Priors

Accumulative: for n-th test, block[1:n] are added as prior. Z = 3

Non-Accumulative: for n-th test, only block[n] are added as prior. Z = 3

Download: (Average of 10 seeds)
1. Accumulative results: Z = 1.65, Z = 2.33, Z= 3
2. Non-Accumulative results: Z = 1.65, Z = 2.33, Z = 3
3.Sorted "top50 & reg" as blocks ( PDF / XLS), gray indicated no entry in vsn-normalization.xls

Data: Control network of vsn_normalization.xls
Setting:
k = 6 (optimum);
seedrange = [1:10];
murange = [0 .1 .5 1 2 4 8 12 16 32 64 100];

Subset recovery for Shift -- Freqency Show

Numbers on the edges represent the number of models from 10 different random seeds
Download: pdf / .sif (with freqency on right)

Data: Shift network of vsn_normalization.xls
Setting: 10 seeds, k = 6 (optimum), mu = 0 (no prior incorporated)

Download: Script
Readme:
1. Run script to get the file containing hit log
Script to Run: "runS_subset_prior_freq.m"

Input:
S_yn.mat
S_inpn.mat
S_inpn.mat
prior_inter.mat

Dependencies:
find_arcs.m

Output:
hitlog/hit_subset


2. Analyze the hit log file
Script to Run : "analyze_hitlog_freq.m"

Input:
hitlog/hit_subset

Output:
freq_Prior_subset_Shift_vsn_top50reg.txt

Format:
from pd to mu= 0 .1 .5 1 2 4 8 12 16 32 64 100

cadB pd cadA 5 9 4 4 5 7 4 2 5 7 4 6

The number behind "cadB pd cadA" indicated this edge occurances among 10 different random seeds models, for different mu.

'top50 & reg' 'Block-Prior' Freqency Show

Best Case: mu = 0.5 (PDF)

Data: vsn-normalization.xls 'Control' Data

Setting:
murange = [0 .1 .5 1 2 4 8 12 16 32 64 100]; Download all figures while mu varies
10 seeds for vbssm model training

X-label: true arc index
Y-label: frequency of the arc recovered in 10 seeds training

Notes:
1) These figures indicate mu=0.5 are optimal
2) tdcA-arcs are more easily recovered then tdcR-arcs

*The frequency analysis is *AGREE with the previous average analysis.